PrivacyDrift
URL AnalyzerNewTools
PrivacyDrift

Privacy Monitoring and Intelligence for modern web.

Twitter logo/X logoLinkedIn logo

© 2026 privacydrift.com

Pages

HomeURL AnalyzerPrivacy Reviews Directory

Privacy Pages

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceDisclaimerMethodologyData SourcesContact

Tools Categories

AI Assistants and ModelsAI Developer ToolsAnalytics and TrackingCloud Storage and File SharingCommunication and MeetingsConsumer Platforms and SocialCRM and Customer Support
Design and Creative ToolsDeveloper Platforms and InfraEcommerce and PaymentsMarketing and EmailProductivity and CollaborationSecurity and Privacy
All ToolsAirtable
Airtable logo

Airtable

Developer Platforms & InfraLast updated: 2026-06-10

Airtable is a collaborative database platform, reviewed for content ownership, privacy rights, sharing, retention, and deletion controls.

ScoreLatest FindingScore BreakdownSource & EvidenceCompanyAlternatives
ScoreLatest FindingScore BreakdownSource & EvidenceCompanyAlternatives

65

Mixed

Good
Mixed
Mixed
Mixed
Good

Overall Score

65

Mixed

AI Training:75
Good
Data Sharing:60
Mixed
Ads & Tracking:60
Mixed
Data Retention:60
Mixed
User Control:75
Good

Overall Score

65

Mixed

AI Training:75
Good
Data Sharing:60
Mixed
Ads & Tracking:60
Mixed
Data Retention:60
Mixed
User Control:75
Good

Latest Policy Findings: 2026-06-10

Airtable pairs heavy tracking with clearer limits on model training.

Strongest: AI Training
75/100

Airtable is strongest where it sets guardrails around AI training, with better limits on how prompts, uploads, or workspace data feed models.

Weakest: Ads & Tracking
60/100

Airtable is weakest on ads and tracking because ad personalization or marketing measurement still shows up and behavioral signals can still travel through analytics or partner tools.

Recommended Action:

Score Breakdown:

AI Training

75

Good

75

Good

Airtable says users own the content they upload.

+30Source [1]

Airtable frames many privacy rights around access, correction, and deletion of service data.

+20Source [2]

Base and workspace permissions still limit who can reach data before optional features are enabled.

+15Source [3]

The policy provides contact paths for permanent deletion support rather than leaving all intervention opaque.

+10Source [4]

The reviewed source does not provide a strong product-specific no-AI-training commitment.

-15Source [5]

Integrations and product-improvement processing still mean uploaded content is not isolated to one narrow use case.

-10Source [6]

Data Sharing

60

Mixed

60

Mixed

Airtable discloses third-party integrations and service-provider data flows.

-25Source [7]

Shared bases and connected tools can expose records beyond the person who entered them.

-15Source [8]

Users can access, correct, amend, or delete content within the services.

+15Source [9]

Workspace and base permissions let teams constrain who sees records internally.

+15Source [10]

Uploaded-content ownership creates a better baseline than a pure platform-owned-content model.

+15Source [11]

Users can request permanent deletion support for certain data-handling issues.

+15Source [12]

Ads & Tracking

60

Mixed

60

Mixed

Airtable collects automatically collected information and may use marketing or advertising technologies.

-20Source [13]

Integrations and website analytics widen the tracking surface beyond just base editing activity.

-20Source [14]

Privacy rights are documented for EEA, UK, Swiss, and U.S. state residents.

+20Source [15]

Airtable is not built as a public social or ad-targeting feed.

+20Source [16]

Workspace permissions and account governance slightly narrow the practical exposure of tracked activity.

+20Source [17]

Data Retention

60

Mixed

60

Mixed

Deleted content may remain in archived or backup copies for revision history and base snapshots.

-25Source [18]

Shared workspaces and integrations can keep copies of data beyond one user's direct deletion action.

-15Source [19]

Users can delete Airtable data and request permanent deletion support.

+20Source [20]

Workspace and base governance can help teams actively manage what data remains available over time.

+15Source [21]

The rights framework gives users a formal basis to challenge or remove retained data.

+15Source [22]

Uploaded-content ownership makes retention questions more reviewable than in opaque platform-owned models.

+10Source [23]

User Control

75

Good

75

Good

Users can manage content within the service and contact privacy@airtable.com for permanent deletion.

+20Source [24]

Access, correction, amendment, and deletion rights are documented.

+20Source [25]

Base and workspace permissions let teams control who can view or edit shared data.

+20Source [26]

Users can choose how and whether to connect third-party tools.

+15Source [27]

Some deletion outcomes still require support and shared workspace or base coordination.

-15Source [28]

In collaborative bases, one person cannot always unilaterally control every copy or permission state.

-10Source [29]

Source & Evidence Links:

Sources:

Airtable Privacy Page

Open: airtable.com

Latest Finding

Open: support.airtable.com

Evidence:

1. AI Use

Airtable says users own the content they upload.

Open: airtable.com

2. AI Use

Airtable frames many privacy rights around access, correction, and deletion of service data.

Open: airtable.com

3. Metadata

Base and workspace permissions still limit who can reach data before optional features are enabled.

Open: airtable.com

4. Retention

The policy provides contact paths for permanent deletion support rather than leaving all intervention opaque.

Open: airtable.com

5. AI Use

The reviewed source does not provide a strong product-specific no-AI-training commitment.

Open: airtable.com

6. Integrations Product-Improvement

Integrations and product-improvement processing still mean uploaded content is not isolated to one narrow use case.

Open: airtable.com

Company Details:

Founded

Jan 2012

Founder

Howie Liu, Andrew Ofstad, and Emmett Nicholas

Parent Company

Airtable

Lifecycle

Active

Category

Developer Platforms & Infra

CEO

Howie Liu

Security Team

In house

Date Added

06-10-2026

Alternatives:

Netlify

Developer Tools

70

Mixed

Vercel logo

Vercel

Developer Tools

65

Mixed

New Relic

Developer Tools

55

Weak

Amazon Web Services logo

Amazon Web Services

Cloud Platform

70

Mixed

Codex logo

Codex

Developer Tools

80

Good

Bitbucket

Developer Tools

70

Mixed