PrivacyDrift
URL AnalyzerNewTools
PrivacyDrift

Privacy Monitoring and Intelligence for modern web.

Twitter logo/X logoLinkedIn logo

© 2026 privacydrift.com

Pages

HomeURL AnalyzerPrivacy Reviews Directory

Privacy Pages

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceDisclaimerMethodologyData SourcesContact

Tools Categories

AI Assistants and ModelsAI Developer ToolsAnalytics and TrackingCloud Storage and File SharingCommunication and MeetingsConsumer Platforms and SocialCRM and Customer Support
Design and Creative ToolsDeveloper Platforms and InfraEcommerce and PaymentsMarketing and EmailProductivity and CollaborationSecurity and Privacy
All ToolsPostHog
PostHog logo

PostHog

Analytics & TrackingLast updated: 2026-06-10

PostHog is a product analytics and feature platform, reviewed for event/session data, cloud versus self-hosting controls, sharing, tracking, retention, and controls.

ScoreLatest FindingScore BreakdownSource & EvidenceCompanyAlternatives
ScoreLatest FindingScore BreakdownSource & EvidenceCompanyAlternatives

65

Mixed

Good
Weak
Poor
Mixed
Good

Overall Score

65

Mixed

AI Training:80
Good
Data Sharing:55
Weak
Ads & Tracking:35
Poor
Data Retention:60
Mixed
User Control:85
Good

Overall Score

65

Mixed

AI Training:80
Good
Data Sharing:55
Weak
Ads & Tracking:35
Poor
Data Retention:60
Mixed
User Control:85
Good

Latest Policy Findings: 2026-06-10

PostHog combines broad tracking with unusually strong privacy controls.

Strongest: User Control
85/100

PostHog gives users more direct privacy control than its other categories, especially around clear admin controls.

Weakest: Ads & Tracking
35/100

PostHog is weakest on ads and tracking because behavioral signals can still travel through analytics or partner tools.

Recommended Action:

Score Breakdown:

AI Training

80

Good

80

Good

PostHog offers self-hosting and customer-controlled deployment instead of forcing all product data into vendor-managed infrastructure.

+30Source [1]

The product is fundamentally an analytics and experimentation platform rather than a consumer AI service that thrives on user prompts.

+25Source [2]

Customers can govern what events, recordings, and product data even enter the system.

+25Source [3]

Recordings, experiments, and AI-adjacent features can still process sensitive event data if customers configure the platform poorly.

-20Source [4]

Data Sharing

55

Weak

55

Weak

PostHog Cloud, exports, integrations, and service providers can still create meaningful data flows.

-45Source [5]

Self-hosting can keep analytics data under the customer's own infrastructure and governance.

+20Source [6]

Customers control projects, exports, and integrations rather than accepting all sharing paths by default.

+20Source [7]

The privacy materials document cloud-service handling rather than pretending that no third parties exist.

+15Source [8]

Ads & Tracking

35

Poor

35

Poor

Analytics and observability tools can collect identifiers, events, session replays, logs, traces, device data, and usage metadata.

-35Source [9]

Teams can reduce exposure with masking, consent mode, sampling, log scrubbing, retention controls, and restricted access.

+20Source [10]

Data Retention

60

Mixed

60

Mixed

Backups, exports, and cloud-service settings can still preserve analytics data longer than teams expect.

-40Source [11]

Customers can govern retention and deletion through project settings and hosting choices.

+20Source [12]

Self-hosting lets teams own backups, storage, and deletion timing directly.

+20Source [13]

Project access controls help limit how long and how broadly sensitive analytics data remains available.

+20Source [14]

User Control

85

Good

85

Good

Admins can manage projects, member access, capture, recordings, retention, and integrations.

+30Source [15]

Customers choose what events and properties they instrument in the first place.

+30Source [16]

Self-hosting and data-masking options let privacy-conscious teams tighten the setup significantly.

+25Source [17]

End-user privacy still depends heavily on how each customer configures capture, masking, and access.

-15Source [18]

Source & Evidence Links:

Sources:

Posthog Privacy Page

Open: posthog.com

Latest Finding

Open: support.google.com

Evidence:

1. Controls

PostHog offers self-hosting and customer-controlled deployment instead of forcing all product data into vendor-managed infrastructure.

Open: posthog.com

2. Tracking

The product is fundamentally an analytics and experimentation platform rather than a consumer AI service that thrives on user prompts.

Open: posthog.com

3. Customers Can

Customers can govern what events, recordings, and product data even enter the system.

Open: posthog.com

4. AI Use

Recordings, experiments, and AI-adjacent features can still process sensitive event data if customers configure the platform poorly.

Open: posthog.com

Company Details:

Founded

Jan 2020

Founder

James Hawkins and Tim Glaser

Parent Company

PostHog

Lifecycle

Active

Category

Analytics & Tracking

CEO

James Hawkins

Security Team

In house

Date Added

06-10-2026

Alternatives:

Hotjar logo

Hotjar

Analytics

65

Mixed

Google Analytics logo

Google Analytics

Analytics

60

Mixed

Amplitude logo

Amplitude

Analytics

60

Mixed

Power BI logo

Power BI

Analytics

75

Good

Mixpanel logo

Mixpanel

Analytics

60

Mixed

Adobe Analytics logo

Adobe Analytics

Analytics

60

Mixed